"Under the 'mark-to-market' rules banks value profits based on an estimation of future income based on a calculation of what would be raised if all loans and mortgages were sold in the market at the best possible price. "A number of politician and economists believe this practice has been a key factor in the decimation of the banking system because it does not reflect the true value of the assets in turbulent market conditions."citywire http://www.citywire.co.uk/professional/-/features/sector-watch/content.aspx?ID=316017
"All year, many bankers have asserted that it was unfair that accounting standards required them to value mortgage securities they own at market value. The frazzled market, they said, was unrealistic about the long-term worth of those assets.
"Markdowns of mortgage assets have, of course, devastated the finances of leading banks.
"Some in Congress who agree with the banks now want to suspend mark-to-market accounting altogether and give lenders much more leeway in valuing mortgage securities at levels that, in theory, more realistically reflect what the assets will return over time. Some House Republicans are pushing harder to change the rules. The Republican Study Committee, a group of House conservatives, has proposed suspending mark-to-market accounting until the SEC "can issue new guidelines that will allow firms to mark these assets to their true economic value." "These conservatives' votes could be crucial in the next go-round of the bailout bill.
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, now a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, on Monday published a piece on Forbes.com entitled 'Suspend Mark-to-Market Now!' Read it here." LA Times http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/money_co/2008/09/the-angry-debat.html
It was not the mortgage industry that set these accounting practices. These practices were changed by Congressional approval of SEC policy. And the practice of sub-prime lending was furthered by the infusion of excess cash into the economy by the Fed during the final years of the Greenspan Administration, although at times it recognized its own mistakes and tried to tighten the prime rate by which lenders set their own loan rates.
Far from being an "experiment in laissez-faire" which imploded, it was once again the long arm of government intervention and interference which set the wheels of the implosion rolling down the mountain, out of the control of the very market which ought to know how to set its own accounting practices for the benefit of its stock holders, and that benefit is, in the end, also to the benefit of borrowers because if the stock holders are not making a profit, the borrowers are not borrowing.
In this case, the stock holders, the very people who are the heart of America, the hard working or retired men and women who have sunk their extra money into retirement hedges and funds and other Wall Street opportunities, are the losers. But this could not have been the wish of those who run Wall Street: many of the top executives who get so-called "Golden Parachutes" got those parachutes in the form of company stocks, which are not as worthless to them as to the middle class who trusted them to stand up to the meddling of politics into the affairs of economics.
mailto:freeassemblage@gmail.com
http://freeassemblage.blogspot.com/
The Free Assemblage of Metaphysical Naturalists is the SM of the
The Free Assemblage of Metaphysical Naturalists LLC.
The Academy of Metaphysical Naturalism TM, The Academy of Metaphysical Naturalism Blogger TM, and
Academy of Metaphysical Naturalism Blogger Extra TM are the educational arms of the LLC and are:
© 2008 by Curtis Edward Clark and Naturalist Academy Publishing ®